Fascism *can* lead to monarchy... it does tend to over-centralize power too quickly. Rather than management of territory through local lords, fascism seeks to maintain direct control by the single high-authority. In the modern age this takes the form of AI and social credit forms. Fascism is unfortunately also unable to derive the existe…
Fascism *can* lead to monarchy... it does tend to over-centralize power too quickly. Rather than management of territory through local lords, fascism seeks to maintain direct control by the single high-authority. In the modern age this takes the form of AI and social credit forms. Fascism is unfortunately also unable to derive the existence of higher moral authority than the state. While fascism could be an intermediary step to monarchy its thrusts in that direction have all fallen apart due to centralized over-reach. China, Germany, Japan, have all made the same mistakes due to hyper-centralized authority and a lack of spiritual moral standards.
Monarchy was the driving force curtailing feudalism.
It's thrusts have fallen apart due to lost wars.
China was a Bolshevik terrorstate engaged in a civil war against itself. Japan was wildly successful by any objective metric. Even in peacetime running a similar style war economy.
Japan was similar to a Western feudalism... the emperor was considered a type of ubermensch arbiter of morality while the shogun merely ruled in the name of the Emperor... simultaneously the Japanese system crashed and burned after industrialization. We need a post-industrial form of feudalism. We've seen functional forms of that in a few non-western nations. Oman comes to mind immediately.
Fascism *can* lead to monarchy... it does tend to over-centralize power too quickly. Rather than management of territory through local lords, fascism seeks to maintain direct control by the single high-authority. In the modern age this takes the form of AI and social credit forms. Fascism is unfortunately also unable to derive the existence of higher moral authority than the state. While fascism could be an intermediary step to monarchy its thrusts in that direction have all fallen apart due to centralized over-reach. China, Germany, Japan, have all made the same mistakes due to hyper-centralized authority and a lack of spiritual moral standards.
Monarchy was the driving force curtailing feudalism.
It's thrusts have fallen apart due to lost wars.
China was a Bolshevik terrorstate engaged in a civil war against itself. Japan was wildly successful by any objective metric. Even in peacetime running a similar style war economy.
Are you a Christian?
Japan was similar to a Western feudalism... the emperor was considered a type of ubermensch arbiter of morality while the shogun merely ruled in the name of the Emperor... simultaneously the Japanese system crashed and burned after industrialization. We need a post-industrial form of feudalism. We've seen functional forms of that in a few non-western nations. Oman comes to mind immediately.